Cumulative
Knowledge survives the investigation. Its evidence, context and status travel with it into the next one.
Knowledge that compounds ↗A new class of AI is needed. One that investigates autonomously, verifies its claims, and builds knowledge that lasts.
A candidate claim enters the investigation.
Explicit rules. Traceable evidence.
Preserve status. Inform the next investigation.
What matters is what an AI can establish, retain, and justifiably build upon.
CCAI proposes an architecture in which autonomous investigation, cumulative knowledge and epistemic certification are separate authorities. Producing a claim is the beginning of its evaluation.
Read the full definition ↗Knowledge survives the investigation. Its evidence, context and status travel with it into the next one.
Knowledge that compounds ↗Claims earn their status through explicit verification. Certification remains scoped, traceable and revisable.
Authority through evidence ↗The system chooses and pursues investigations. Initiative does not give it the authority to certify its own claims.
Investigation with boundaries ↗CCAI is a proposed class of systems, defined by its Charter. It is not presented as an established scientific category, an adopted standard, or a validated technology.
Generation, selection, memory and certification are different authorities. The architecture keeps that distinction explicit.
Explore the complete architecture ↗01 / GENERATIONThe LLM may propose.
02 / SELECTIONThe Agent may choose.
03 / MEMORYMemory may compose.
THE FUNDAMENTAL SEPARATIONNone of them may certify.
The canonical loop / eleven stages, in order
↺ Reconsider dependent conclusions when evidence or context changes. Begin the next investigation.
Abstention is an explicit outcome.
When the evidence supports neither certification nor refutation, uncertainty stays visible. CCAI certifies claims within a procedure and context; it does not certify intelligence itself.
The claim satisfies the applicable certification requirements.
The claim is contradicted under the applicable verification procedure.
The available evidence does not justify either conclusion.
The Charter defines CCAI. It sets the boundaries for verification, memory, provenance, composition and auditability.
Read the complete Charter ↗Generation is not certification.
No LLM, autonomous agent, memory system or heuristic receives epistemic authority merely because it generated, selected or stored a claim.
A claim can acquire certified status only through an independent verification procedure appropriate to that claim.
The authority that determines certification must be independent from the act of proposing the claim.
The verification mechanism and the rules governing certification must be explicitly identifiable and auditable.
When evidence is insufficient to establish or refute a claim, the system must be able to abstain.
Uncertainty must never be silently converted into certainty.
The durable product of an investigation is not merely a generated answer.
It is the body of traceable knowledge that survives verification and can participate in future investigation.
Selected articles from the normative text. Where explanatory material and the Charter differ, the Charter governs.
FLORN is a reference implementation under active development exploring the CCAI architecture. CCAI remains conceptually independent of any implementation.